This is a comment I have left at Russell’s site, reproduced here for future memory:
Andy – comment 541991 by O’Donnell at WUWT appears to contradict your “poor form” statement
Title of the post: I do not see any misrepresentation in Anthony’s use of the word “rebuts” […] There is nothing inconsistent between ‘rebuttal’ and ‘improvement’
Given the fact that Watts has not used the term “repudiate”, what exactly are you accusing him of insinuating?
Secondly, you ask how can the new paper be “achieving something potentially useful”. Well, you’ve answered yourself:
a rapidly warming peninsula is not a good situation either and is also likely to have anthropogenic causes, albeit complicated ones.
This should be welcome news to all interested in seeing climate science progress forward at a regional level. If O’Donnell et al are right – we have a rapidly-warming region that is called Antarctic Peninsula, and it stands out against its surroundings…let’s figure out what is happening!!
If on the other hand Steig et al are right – there isn’t much to do, is there, apart from putting a few more weather stations across West Antarctica to confirm the claimed trends…especially given the fact that the Antarctic Peninsula does sport a highly positive measured anomaly, as in NASA’s Earth Observatory note for Dec 10.