Climate Chaos at the New York Times
Follow up to my “ANTI-SOON CAMPAIGN GOES SMEARING WHOLE CATEGORIES OF SCIENTISTS” post, I can now show how Somebody at the NYT noticed exactly what I pointed to, and tried to change history but ultimately failed in the process.
Yesterday I had noticed that casual readers would only get the message that a climate researcher was somehow involved with undeclared corporate interests. This is because the online article was titled “Ties to Corporate Cash for Climate-Change Researcher” with no reference to the outside-of-the-consensus position of Willie Soon, who found himself representing literally any climate scientist.
Given what happens with politicians, it would then be expected that the same casual readers would conclude some form of corruption be endemic to climate science. Not exactly the Narrative favored by the New York Times.
Turns out the same online article has since been changed, at least in the title, that now reads “Deeper Ties to Corporate Cash for Doubtful Climate Researcher“. Apart from the dramatizing use of “Deeper”, the important bit is the addition of “Doubtful” – removing at last the apparent smear against all climate scientists of every opinion.
A last-minute correction following a blog post? It’s not so simple. Here’s the story as I can see it now
1. The original article (“Ties to Corporate Cash for Climate-Change Researcher“) appeared online before 2AM EST Sunday Feb 22, as per Wayback Machine. It was timestamped “3:05PM”, presumably Saturday Feb 21

2. The same title appeared on the official Facebook NYT pages, timestamped 12:53AM Sunday – AFAIK, that’s GMT, or in other words, 7:53PM Saturday EST

3. Same title got propagated by various news outlets and blogs


4. Then something happened. The printed (US) edition of Sunday showed the new title (“Deeper Ties to Corporate Cash for Doubtful Climate Researcher“). I do not know if more than one printing is done on Sundays: assuming it is not, the change was made in a real hurry as one can only presume 2AM is already a little late for the printers

5. Whoever ordered the change, forgot to distribute it in full. So the International New York Times, printed for delivery on Monday, still carried a version of the old title (apologies for the small size of the picture)

6. Both versions of the article are visible on the International NYT archive – in fact I am not aware of any material change in the text between one title and the other

7. Yesterday I then noticed that the original “Ties” version was on the NYT website – another misdistribution of the correction. But by sometimes in the AM GMT, the online title was changed to the new “Deeper” version too.
On past performance, this is yet another heavy handed intervention by Somebody High Above at the NYT to correct a climate article that had gone astray, just as for this 2010 article, dramatically changed between the IHT printed edition and the NYT website.
(yes I have imagery demonstrating the changes)
In that case, the newspaper of record made Judith Curry disappear, to be replaced by a nobody from the UCS with zero climate science background. And Gavin.
#auspol http://t.co/6J56Z2m8H6 Climate Chaos at the New York Times
RT @Climate_Cop: Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol http://t.co/VKd3fqMTfe
Climate Chaos at the New York Times http://t.co/PIoIAGXgzF #auspol
Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol http://t.co/VKd3fqMTfe
#auspol http://t.co/HpEHr5fn7i Climate Chaos at the New York Times
#auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times http://t.co/4ewrI3GTal
RT @Aileen1st: Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol http://t.co/1YglBHOitE
http://t.co/YbktfjNGPO #auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times
http://t.co/zn4mnB2hjb #auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times
Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol http://t.co/xYVnSvZpof
Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol http://t.co/1YglBHOitE
#auspol http://t.co/En6Xr4za5q Climate Chaos at the New York Times
RT @MarcoALib: Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol http://t.co/VFYmqmi1ta
RT @MarcoALib: Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol http://t.co/VFYmqmi1ta
http://t.co/o3ailseqpC Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol
#auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times http://t.co/qDDjA6EVlu
#auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times http://t.co/Cdbik5521j
#auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times http://t.co/rceMdQr4qF
http://t.co/OzIrJ543Lf #auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times
#auspol http://t.co/iQhJOAWAfm Climate Chaos at the New York Times
http://t.co/cVcAXalKZc #auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times
#auspol http://t.co/wXpr6ciooS Climate Chaos at the New York Times
http://t.co/170xZ1jHfq Climate Chaos at the New York Times #auspol
Climate Chaos at the New York Times http://t.co/pnZuqKxS3W #auspol
Maurizio, there is a simpler explanation this time. In the UK reporters don’t write the headline the sub-editor does. On consideration is the space they have available on the page.
– In the NYT print the Sub may have decided to use a more defining headline, then added the story to the website to be consistant.
– In the IHT perhaps for spacing they kept the old title.
– I wouldn’t trust NYT on environmental stories at all. Rather than simply REPORT stories it is
the custom of all media these days from newspapers, radio, popsci and serious journals to all CONSTRUCT and SPIN NARRATIVES.
– Your 2010 NYT example is a strong proof of this.
– As regards Soon the story is clearly spin-tronics, cos the actual story is of incredibly low magnitude as the “new evidence” changes nothing.. The 1. It’s the Motive fallacy to thinl you can simply dismiss a paper on grounds of who funded it; arguments in his papers stand whoever funded
2. Anyone in the field reading the papers would have been well aware that Soon was a famous “denier” who has always said “Yes of course some of my work has been funded by lots of companies including fossil fuels, but that doesn’t’ influence the results I get for work the work they sponsor or work I do on papers for others.” – For NYT to pretend that their “new information” changed anyones opinion of his papers is ridiculous.
– Soon is entitled to due process; I can wait a couple of months for an inquiry before judging him further.
RT @omnologos: #Climate Chaos at @nytimes: how the Newspaper of Record tried (again) to change History http://t.co/AWi2ak7A21 #WillieSoon
RT @orach24463_cj: #Climate Chaos at @nytimes http://t.co/mkBimIoMYl Who Ignore Deep Big Oil Ties Of Warmist Scientists http://t.co/Pufxc33…
#Climate Chaos at @nytimes http://t.co/mkBimIoMYl Who Ignore Deep Big Oil Ties Of Warmist Scientists http://t.co/Pufxc33HnW @DRUDGE_REPORT
RT @omnologos: #Climate Chaos at @nytimes: how the Newspaper of Record tried (again) to change History http://t.co/AWi2ak7A21 #WillieSoon
#auspol Climate Chaos at the New York Times http://t.co/7BhR7m2zxh
#Climate Chaos at the @nytimes http://t.co/jFdjemKUUt #WillieSoon
Climate Chaos at the New York Times http://t.co/AWi2ak7A21