The Skeptics Society has just held its Environmental Wars conference, to "debate about whether human activity is actually changing the climate of the planet"
Best links to get information about the conference appear so far to be:
As a long-time Climate Change skeptic, I can only be glad to see that no less a skeptic than Michael Shermer had been unwilling to jump on the CC bandwagon, until a few weeks ago. So there is no need to provide evidence that I am not paid by evil Oil companies to air my views: especially when I doubt the more catastrophical claims
In any case: having literally read it all, my impression is that the debate remains as polarized as ever, with each side seeing what they want.
At the end of the day, it may go down to a communications issue.
Some people simply refuse to be cajoled into intellectual submission by scare stories and depictions of upcoming disasters.
Some other people think those disasters are coming but are failing to identify how to communicate it without resorting to “the end of the world is nigh…repent!”.
And so, after realizing their message is not being heard as expected, the latter group try to coherce the former a little stronger, with several insults thrown in the process
So here's my plea to all Climate-Change-is-awful-let's-act-now People: Please change your ways at communicating. This is no way to conduct an intelligent debate. And it is no way to obtain results
If you guys and gals really believe to be right, find a way to get things done.
And stop asserting that "the debate is over". It doesn't work, either.