If Singh’s original sentence was the following (the article has been withdrawn)
[The BCA] is the respectable face of the chiropractic profession and yet it happily promotes bogus treatments
then the implication that the BCA is knowingly promoting bogus treatment could hardly have been spelled out more clearly.
People may argue about the opportunity for the BCA to throw itself into what was obviously going to be a high-profile case.
But if they had left Singh’s words unchallenged, surely at the BCA itself they could have open the floodgates to legal actions by unhappy clients…and especially unhappy had they learned that the BCA did not believe in its treatments.
There is a general consensus that English libel laws are just unfair and can be used in lieu of censorship. But Singh wasn’t exactly born yesterday, and must have know those laws for a long time.