Still a tad too many “will” statements, but lots less of “could” and “would” than in the past…
Andrew C. Revkin’s blog (and printed articles) sound definitely less biased nowadays.
Is this the start of a Revkin Cooling trend?
Best comment so far to his latest blog:
There is a message here for both sides of the global warming debate and especially the media. Stop tying every short term fluctuation, whether it be ice sheets, hurricane numbers, or the number of mosquitoes in Kathmandu to global warming or the lack thereof. It’s no wonder that a large body of the public remains skeptical about the global warming community’s projections of catastrophe 30 years from now.
— Jack
0 replies on “Whatever Happened to Andrew Revkin?”
[…] Andy Revkin is not a full-time journalist any longer, so his climate change reporting has progressively improved compared to the past, becoming much less biased. QED […]
[…] at when Revkin (a journalist I am grudgingly but steadily learning to respect) makes a very clear point to Romm: As I [Revkin] wrote in 2006 (”Yelling Fire on a Hot Planet“) […]