Atheism Christianity English Europe

About The Christian Roots of the Enlightenment

As then-Cardinal Ratzinger once said, “The affirmation [about] the Christian roots of Europe […] relates, first of all, to an historical fact that no one can seriously deny“.

And obviously not just of Europe, but of pretty much everything European, including of course all that has been born from European minds. Including, that is, the Enlightenment.

Why can’t anybody seriously deny that? Because philosophical movements cannot appear out of thin air. Of course, Locke, Hume, Voltaire, Rousseau and the others could not use Shinto or Zoroastrian ways of thinking, but Christian ones, because they were educated by, were thinking like and had to always confront themselves with Christian culture(s).

There are six sections dedicated to The Soul in Voltair’s Philosophical Dictionary. None to the Buddhist concept of Nirvana. QED.

Check the answers to my series of blogs on Atheism. All too often, all too tellingly people nominally “without-a-god” reply with a frame of mind that actually implies a personal, omnipotent God.

That is, the Christian God.


One thing I don’t understand is why something as obvious as the above should be controversial. Or perhaps I do understand: simply, the people that will shout the most against Christianity are bound to be the ones that despite claiming Atheism are actually Christian through and through, and they hate themselves for that.

Little hope to have a serious discussion with them.

But what does the above mean? Have we discovered the Last Stand for the Children of the Enlightenment? Should they be forced to honestly admit their roots are Christian?

I’m afraid not: because if Europe has Christian roots, those are not the only roots (Jewish and Islamic roots should be added of course, and that’s mentioning only the religious side…).

And if everybody should accept that the Enlightenment has (also) Christian roots, then everybody should accept that Christianity has (also) Pagan roots.

An enormous amount of time has been dedicated by people in the Church(es) to reconcile Jesus’ thoughts with Greek Philosophy, from the Gospel of St John onwards. Just as for the Enlightenment, the “new message” of Christianity had to be communicated by people to people.

The only way to do that was and is by using contemporary imagery, ways of thinking, categories of thought and historical philosophical arguments. Many of these were (“Pagan”) Greek at the time of Jesus, and so in our part of the world Christianity had to be built from Pagan Greek roots. QED once again…

Italia Italiano Politica Repubblica

Sempre Piu’ Polli a La Repubblica

Alla redazione de La Repubblica non si smentiscono mai: hanno abboccato un’altra volta, dopo essere cascati per anni nelle trappole mediatiche di Berlusconi, e non aver resistito alla tentazione di abboccare alle provocazioni di Der Spiegel,  eccoli li’ di nuovo pronti a fare pubblicita’ a Calderoli:

From: “Maurizio Morabito”
Subject: La Lega e la Sen. Montalcini (ma perche’ ci cascate sempre?)
To: “Lettere al Direttore Repubblica” , “Redazione La Repubblica”

Caro Direttore, cara Redazione

Ma e’ mai possibile che vi (e ci) facciate sempre prendere in giro in base al “diritto di cronaca” (che non e’ un dovere)?

Una volta abboccavate a tutte quello che usciva dalla bocca di Berlusconi, anche se completamente campato in aria, regalandogli titoloni su titoloni sul giornale.

Oggi invece e’ toccato alla Lega acquisire spazio gratuito sul sito con la proposta assolutamente velleitaria di togliere i finanziamenti all’istituto della Sen. Montalcini.

L’emendamento-Calderoli non ha nessuna speranza di essere approvato. L’unico motivo per presentarlo e’ perche’ Calderoli ottenga gratis uno spazio e pubblicita’ sui giornali.

E voi come tanti pesci lessi, naturalmente gli avete dato l’uno e
E non mi venite a raccontare che siete obbligati a dare tutte le notizie, perche’ non e’ vero. Se lo fosse allora Repubblica non sarebbe un giornale, ma una successione di comunicati stampa.